Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Spot the difference


Here are two posts (here and here) that look very similar (same graphs). Both show that private indebtedness was the result of wage stagnation. The first was published the 18th, while the latter the 3rd of July. I'm glad he is reading it.

5 comments:

  1. Articles by Professor Lars Pålsson Syll on the topic:
    Why general equilibrium economics is a dead end
    http://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2012/07/21/why-general-equilibrium-economics-is-a-dead-end/

    Please say after me – Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu http://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2012/07/21/please-say-after-me-sonnenschein-mantel-debreu-2/

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's much more than a scissor graph... it's a heart attack post-Bretton Woods:

    http://u.jimdo.com/www54/o/s6131fc6a6e98445e/img/i760fb7012be3df39/1337687935/std/image.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Keynes’ denial of conflict: a reply to Professor Heise’s critique

Tom Palley reply to response about his paper on Keynes lack of understanding of class conflict. In many ways, this is how Tom discusses Ke...